Who and why
About HiveCraft.
An owner-stewarded effort to give every hive a fair score. The methodology is published openly.
Where this comes from
The model emerged from a series of multi-agent debates inside a working hive. The intent was always to keep what mattered across the existing standards — and add the agentic-software-development pieces those standards leave gaps for.
How decisions get made
- An owner-steward holds the canon — they freeze applicability when a question is undefined, rather than guess.
- Reviews happen on a regular cadence. If a published claim is later withdrawn, the surface goes down with it.
- A small set of integrity rules makes published claims comparable; without them, claims do not get published.
How to contribute
The model is published as an open canon. To propose a change, send a typed proposal — there is a simple template. Discussion happens in the open. Ask a question.
Stewardship
The model is owner-stewarded under a dual-review cadence: the owner-steward and an independent reviewer must concur before any public change lands. There are no version-numbers on this site; change is tracked internally and surfaced through dated stewardship notes.
Scope of the model
This is a scoring model. The highest stage is a stated direction-of-travel and requires a disclaimer until calibrated cohorts exist.
If this is not what you are looking for, that is fair. Take a moment, then come back if you want.