HiveCraft

Where this meets what you already use

Cross-walked to the frameworks your auditors already know.

This is not a replacement for ISO, NIST, or the EU AI Act. It complements them — adding the agentic-software-development specifics they do not cover and mapping back to the controls and clauses they do.

One row per framework

The table below names where each external framework touches the model. It is a navigational aid; per-item traceability lives in the canonical reference.

Cross-walk to external frameworks
Framework Reference HiveCraft dimensions Notes
ISO 27001:2022 A.5 / A.6 / A.8
  • D1
  • D4
  • D8
  • D9
Annex A controls for security policy, organisation, and asset management map across HCSM operational and risk groups.
NIST CSF 2.0 GOVERN / IDENTIFY / DETECT / RESPOND
  • D2
  • D8
  • D10
  • D11
GOVERN function aligns with D11 disclosure and D9 jurisdiction; DETECT.CM aligns with D2 telemetry.
NIST AI RMF 1.0 GOVERN / MAP / MEASURE / MANAGE
  • D6
  • D9
  • D10
  • D11
AI-specific risk-management functions map to retrieval-grounding (D6), compliance (D9), and disclosure (D11).
EU AI Act Art. 9 / 15 / 16 / 26 / 50
  • D9
  • D10
  • D11
Risk-management system (Art. 9), accuracy/robustness (Art. 15), QMS (Art. 16), deployer obligations (Art. 26), transparency (Art. 50).
GDPR Art. 6 / 7 / 13 / 14 / 30 / 32
  • D8
  • D9
Lawful basis, consent versioning (Art. 7 mirrors HCSM consent_versions), records of processing, security of processing.
CMMI CM / PR / VV / OT / OPP
  • D1
  • D3
  • D7
  • D12
  • D13
Configuration Management, Process Quality, Verification and Validation, Organisational Training, Organisational Performance.
SPACE framework Satisfaction / Performance / Activity / Communication / Efficiency
  • D2
  • D13
Developer-productivity framing complements HCSM telemetry and outcome groups.
MLOps maturity MS / Google / AWS levels
  • D1
  • D2
  • D3
  • D4
Industry MLOps level-2 capabilities are necessary (not sufficient) for HCSM Group A at L4.
ISO 42001 AI Management System
  • D9
  • D10
  • D11
AI-specific management-system standard; HCSM Group C carries ISO 42001 obligations for REG-typed practices.
ISO/IEC 25010 Quality model
  • D6
Functional suitability, reliability, security characteristics inform retrieval/grounding evaluation.
ISO 9001 Clauses 7.1.6 / 7.2 / 8.6
  • D5
  • D7
  • D12
Organisational knowledge, competence, release of products and services map to KB curation and acceptance.
ISO 31000 Risk management
  • D10
Generic risk-management process underpins HCSM risk-register expectations.
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (CC)
  • D8
  • D13
Security and availability TSCs map to HCSM hardening and stakeholder-outcome groups.
PCI DSS Latest standard
  • D8
Payment-card environments contribute Class-S statutory blockers when in scope.
CIS Benchmarks OS / Cloud / Container
  • D8
Benchmark-derived hardening drift contributes to D8 evidence.
COBIT 2019 BAI08 / EDM
  • D5
Knowledge management governance objective complements HCSM KB curation discipline.
ISO/IEC 17021-1 Conformity-assessment / certification bodies
  • D11
Aggregator / publisher obligations under §15-A6 inherit ISO/IEC 17021-1 precedent for comparative claims.
Microsoft RAI MM Responsible AI Maturity Model
  • D9
  • D11
Vendor-published RAI MM level mappings indicate D9/D11 coverage but do not substitute for HCSM evidence.

Why these frameworks?

Each one already carries auditable evidence expectations relevant to agentic-software-development practice. Where a framework partially overlaps, this model does not duplicate — it references and adds the agentic-specific items missing from the source standard.

Need help mapping this into your existing controls?

The about page lists how to reach us; the contact page is the simplest route.